If Martial Law is the President's—and America's—Only Remaining Viable Option To Preserve Our Constitutional Republic… Let It Be So!
Two and a half years ago, I urged the President to fulfill what to me was arguably his most important campaign promise: to restore the rule of law in America. See Memo to President Trump: Prosecute Hillary Clinton or Perish. At that time, I suggested that would require our government to prosecute the likes of Hillary Clinton for crimes they committed to take down a duly elected President. I thought holding such characters accountable for their seditious activities was imperative to avoid the future anarchy and consequent tyranny similar to that which we are witnessing today.
Unfortunately, that did not come to pass. The most those like me who are concerned with such quaint notions like “justice” and the “rule of law” have been offered is a dystopian lie generated by our Department of Justice that resembles Orwellian double-speak—a series of ongoing opaque references to some guy named Durham who we are continually told we may hear from soon… but never do. And, sadder still, should we find ourselves with a Biden-Harris Administration… I predict we never will.
Given this absolute absence of any accountability for crimes committed by certain individuals to take out a President, it should come as no surprise to anyone today those same enemies now don’t seem to even care that the entire nation has now witnessed their brazen—and some would say successful—commission of election fraud that finally allowed them to remove the President they hate, and yet, failed to overthrow in a series of prior coupe attempts now spanning over four years. What is amazing, however, is these same enemies of the President have now also revealed that their presently apparent success at robbing him—and America—of his win at the ballot box is not enough for them. They also wanted to invoke the 25th Amendment to remove him from office and, with that having failed, have now filed articles of impeachment based on spurious allegations that he committed sedition one week before the President is to leave office. From this, it is obvious his enemies have revealed themselves determined to come as close to killing him as they can without leaving them with the present inconvenience of their having to deal with the disposal of his corpse.
These actions should serve as a warning to the President that these hate-filled enemies may very well have plans for worse things to come for him, his family and our nation following the inauguration of Biden.
Please note, the articles of impeachment filed in the House this week accuse the President of advocating insurrection intended to overthrow the government of the United States—i.e. treason. It should not be enough for the President to take comfort in the thought expressed by some that an impeachment filed this late in his term won’t succeed. The real question the President should be asking is whether the Department of Justice under the direction of Joe Biden—much less that of Kamala Harris—might be inclined to pick up these allegations and prosecute him—as a private citizen—for treason in a federal court after he leaves office. Because his enemies obviously find our laws and Constitution malleable—if not disposable—whenever it may serve their purposes, this threat could be very real. If he doubts it, perhaps he should ask General Flynn what can be made possible in a kangaroo federal court similar to that of Judge Emmett Sullivan. Truth places no limits on the false accusations and supporting evidence that such a judge can allow to be introduced by people who clearly do not share the President’s moral values—e.g. Pelosi, Nadler, Schiff, Schumer, Swalwell, Pence and McConnell—because they have none. Then consider the coverage such a trial would be afforded by the mainstream fake news outlets and Silicon Valley social media executives who evidently share space with such folks in the same moral vacuum they inhabit.
The President would also be mistaken to dismiss this threat based on any belief that his wealth would be more than enough to afford the legal talent necessary to forestall a conviction regardless of the court assigned to hear his case. To disabuse himself of that notion he might want to ask his legal staff to get him a memo of the likely consequences of the federal asset forfeiture provisions such a judge might apply to a person charged with committing treason against the United States of America. If they were to kick in—which I think is likely—his even affording an attorney at all could become a concern.
And, lastly, were that not enough, the President would also do well to consider the collateral adverse impact such a progressive lynch mob could have on his children and grandchildren. It’s anyone’s guess what a hate-filled mob might do to eradicate any perceived future threat of retaliation they might pose. If you doubt such a risk could exist, ask the Romanov family.
This brings me to a crowded zoom meeting I attended earlier this week in which Retired Lt. General Thomas McInerney and attorney L. Lin Wood addressed the over 5,000 patriotic Americans in attendance.
In summary, I came away from that experience with the conclusion that both these men believe the President has in his possession enough evidence of foreign interference in our recent election to justify a reversal of the election’s outcome to justify his invocation of either or both the Insurrection Act of 1807 and Executive Order 13848 to enable the military to investigate the election fraud that has been alleged to have been committed by American conspirators in concert with certain identified foreign nations.
To be clear, I do not know the accuracy of this information. But I do have faith in the integrity and honor of the two men who attested to its accuracy. Unfortunately, however, the two questions their presentations left hanging at the end of the meeting were: (i) whether the President is fully aware of the evidence in his possession; and, (ii) if he is, what exactly has he decided to do with it? This is troubling. After all, as we all know, he only has a few days left to do anything.
To that end, if the foregoing is indeed accurate and lawful, I urge the President to please unleash the dogs. Allow the truth to come into the light and expose the corruption while this opportunity remains available to him. If that requires the imposition of martial law pending the results of an investigation of our election by military intelligence officials … so be it.
Then I would suggest he stand back and let God bless the 72 million Americans who want to know if the President’s enemies have done nothing less than project on to him that of which they may very well be guilty of themselves—i.e. treason.
At least, that seemed to be the gist of the prayer for the President offered on behalf of the over 5,000 people who love their country at the close of a single zoom meeting just this week.
To either post a comment on this editorial or contact the author, join our discussions by subscribing—for free—to The American Landscape …
